Study reveals stark nutritional gaps in Austria's plant-based milk alternatives

A recent study has examined the nutritional quality of plant-based milk alternatives in Austria. The findings reveal significant differences between product types, with many failing to meet health guidelines. Researchers assessed sugar and fat levels across various plant-based options.

The analysis, conducted by SIPCAN, showed that one in three plant-based milk alternatives in Austria did not meet nutritional standards. Coconut-based products performed the worst, with only 12% meeting the criteria. These contained an average of 7.1 grams of sugar and 6.5 grams of fat per 100 millilitres.

Drinkable milk alternatives fared better than thicker, spoonable versions. Around 90% of the drinkable products met the guidelines, compared to just 25% of the spoonable ones. Oat and almond milks stood out as healthier options, with 85% of each category passing the assessment.

Oat milks averaged 4.3 grams of sugar and 1.9 grams of fat per 100 millilitres. Almond milks had even lower levels, with 2.1 grams of sugar and 2.1 grams of fat. The study did not compare these results with broader European market trends due to a lack of available data.

The report highlights a clear divide in nutritional quality among plant-based milk alternatives in Austria. While oat and almond options generally meet health standards, coconut-based products often fall short. Consumers now have clearer data on which alternatives align with dietary recommendations.